<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPatriot Act Ready</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ultimateminority.com/2008/08/08/ipatriot-act-ready/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ultimateminority.com/2008/08/08/ipatriot-act-ready/</link>
	<description>Whenever you find that you are on the side of the majority, it is time to reform - Mark Twain</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 05:21:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rcj</title>
		<link>http://www.ultimateminority.com/2008/08/08/ipatriot-act-ready/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>rcj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ultimateminority.com/?p=120#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I would highly recommend reading Beyond Fear by Bruce Schneier to further understand why the Patriot Act is a bad thing. He has long worked in the world of information security starting with encryption algorithms and has developed a strong understanding of security. His primary theme is security is a always a trade-off, possibly more protection for more hassle / less freedom. He has some interesting insights about how people have different perspectives on security and how they use their agenda&#039;s to set policy. He discusses a concept of &quot;security theatre&quot;, which where people want to make it seem like they are doing something valuable but actually making a bad trade-off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would highly recommend reading Beyond Fear by Bruce Schneier to further understand why the Patriot Act is a bad thing. He has long worked in the world of information security starting with encryption algorithms and has developed a strong understanding of security. His primary theme is security is a always a trade-off, possibly more protection for more hassle / less freedom. He has some interesting insights about how people have different perspectives on security and how they use their agenda&#8217;s to set policy. He discusses a concept of &#8220;security theatre&#8221;, which where people want to make it seem like they are doing something valuable but actually making a bad trade-off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

